Singapore. (27 July 2010.  2350 hrs).  Yoshinoya has responded to the incident by stating that it was an "isolated incident" and that the mistake was made by a "part-time trainee".  In their press statement Yoshinoya reiterated that their company follows "stringent standard operating procedures" and that they endeavour to "provide products and services that meet the highest expectations of their customers".

Initial response to Yoshinoya's statement has been negative with many STOMPers accusing the company of using the part-time trainee as a scape-goat.  A closer look at Yoshinoya's Crisis Communication plan reveals a major flaw - failure to understand the difference between Traditional Media vs New Media.

In the former, a statement of this nature would have been acceptable as reporters would have used the facts to write their story.  However, as Yoshinoya had chosen to respond via the New Media (and rightly so), a modified form of statement would have been necessary.  In this case, the response from Yoshinoya should have been directly addressed to the STOMPer that raised the issue, as this would have allowed Yoshinoya to more adequately address his "outrage".

Once again, as I mentioned in my research paper, PR Professional must understand the New Media before they can effectively serve their clients.
 
Singapore.  (27 July 2010 0700 hrs).  The number of views has climbed to 16,163.  Assuming 50% of these viewer tell at least 2 friends and 50% of those tell 2 another friends, the total number of people who would have heard about this incident would be quite staggering (approximately 48,489 people) and the potential loss in revenue quite significant.

As mentioned in my research paper on the impact of the "perfect information environment", other readers of STOMP have started sharing similar negative experiences with the company.  A quick glance at the comments shows that readers have complained about additional charges for extra sauces and extra spoons.  These additional "support" reveals a pattern of unreasonable charges and is likely to further impact the company's client base.
 
Singapore.  (26 July 2010 2300 hrs).  It is now slightly more than 24 hours since the incident was published on STOMP.  There has been 15,534 views of the report and 80 comments.  76% of readers have expressed "outraged" over the incident with many saying they should bring their business elsewhere.

As of 2300 hrs, Yoshinoya has not responded to the incident and the longer they wait, the greater the negative impact as negative word of mouth will spread.

Let's continue to monitor the situation to see if Yoshinoya will respond, and if they do, how they respond.
 
Singapore.  (26 July 2010.  0700 hrs).  STOMP yesterday published a story in which the Yoshinoya outlet at Compass Point gave a customer half a cup of Coke as she had ordered it "without" ice.

The incident occurred on 24 July and so far there has been no response from Yoshinoya.  This is understandable as it happened over the weekend and the company's main office is likely to be closed.  It thus remains to be seen if Yoshinoya will respond to this potentially reputation damaging incident.

As highlighted in my research, the traditional media is not the only source of news and information.  Companies therefore need to monitor the New Media to be aware of any issues that may affect the company.